Philosophy Out of Thin Air

Doing more with less is one way to progress in P4C. This week, an example of an enquiry with Year 5, starting from absolutely nothing, which provides a structure you can use over and over again to explore important concepts. There are three stages:
r
  1. Choose a concept
  2. Identify its ingredients
  3. Explore their relations
r
For each stage, Iโ€™ve given the sort of language I would use with the class to introduce it. I happened to do this whole enquiry with the group standing up, which helped to make it pacey.
r
1. Choose a concept
r
You can choose the concept yourself and move straight to stage 2. With younger children, friendship is always interesting.
r
โ€œWhat we need is a big idea to talk about. Something that you canโ€™t see or touch, but that is really important. So an abstract noun like beauty or truth. The sorts of thing that often has an opposite, like happiness vs. sadness. Something where different people have different ideas about what it means, like โ€œsuccessโ€ which can mean different things to different people.โ€
r
After getting a few examples, they can talk in pairs or groups. Hear four or five, politely discard as โ€œinteresting but wonโ€™t work for this particular sessionโ€ any suggestions that donโ€™t meet the criteria, then vote: a quick show of hands, not a long ritual.
r
In the session Iโ€™m recalling, the concept they settled on was โ€œlifeโ€.
r
2. Identify its ingredients
r
โ€œWhat does it take to make x?โ€ย or, the variation I used in this case,ย โ€œWhat does it take to make a good x?โ€ย Talking about a good life, rather than just life, avoided a rehearsal of biological ideas and moved us on to the list of ingredients pictured below. Capture the ideas on mini- whiteboard. You donโ€™t need as many as this, and my usual rule is to stop at four or five, but this was a particularly rich and complex concept.
r
r
3. Explore their relations
r
Must-have ingredients (necessary conditions)
โ€œWhich of the ingredients is a must-have ingredient of x?โ€ โ€œIf it didnโ€™t have friendship, it wouldnโ€™t be a good life.โ€
r
โ€œEnoughโ€ ingredients (sufficient conditions)
โ€œAre any of the ingredients enough for x?โ€ โ€œIf youโ€™re happy, thatโ€™s enough for a good life.โ€
r
Jointly sufficient conditions
โ€œIf you put some of these ingredients together, are they enough for x?โ€ โ€œI think happiness and a bit of suffering are enough, because if you donโ€™t have any suffering you donโ€™t understand people who have difficult livesโ€
r
Counterexamples
โ€œDoes anyone have a counterexample, of how you could have x without y?โ€ โ€œAre there any good lives that are not happy lives?โ€
r
Emerging Questions
r
Sometimes, as with any enquiry, a question may emerge that takes you past the initial analysis of the concept and becomes the focus. In this discussion, one girl thought that suffering was a must-have ingredient, because if you had never suffered, you wouldnโ€™t have empathy for people who had, and that would make you uncaring about them.ย โ€œDo you have to have suffered to understand other peopleโ€™s suffering?โ€ย was an interesting question we could have used in a subsequent session, perhaps finding a stimulus to suit the question that had already emerged.
r
Best wishes,
r
Jason

Leave a Comment

Shopping Cart

We Make Resources So You 
Don't Have To!

We support over 17,000 teachers deepen their pupils' thinking through our weekly bulletin.

You'll receive freshly-made, topical resources to use straight away with your classes.

We only use your email to send you resources. We do not and would never share your information with a third party.

Scroll to Top